Monday, November 30, 2009

My Thoughts on the #RebootAB Movement

Over the weekend a progressive group assembled in Red Deer, AB for a meeting of the minds on how to make AB a better place. I did not attend but here is my take on it from what I have read, by all means I hope the many that attended can correct me on my perception.

First I will start off by explaining why I did not attend the meeting. I felt that the views of what progressive means outlined prior to the meeting were a) WAP members were not progressive b) if you are conservative you can not be progressive c) you need to buy into the green oil kool-aid and d) need to believe there is no other options available. None of this was said or confirmed, just my feelings on it as it was rolled out as I fell into much of the criticized categories.

Many of the bloggers I admire and respect were in attendance, which when compared to them I am somewhat of a political hack. There was huge support for another upstart party with a progressive movement that will listen to the people. Geez, I have never heard that before, kind of sounds like the same thing every political party has said since the beginning of time. This time will be different though I am sure. Some of the members have already excluded many that may have followed a movement like this, so for me I think it will remain a stalled movement. Many of the bloggers that I have followed over the years have so much to offer in terms of ideas and knowledge, but it is much easier to be a pundit than to run a province with such a diverse set of views. Bill 44 was a huge part of the push for a few of the attendants of Reboot, however it would be quite interesting to see how many Albertans actually support this bill (as we all know I am not one).

I do hope a political party is formed out of this, as I for one think we need a balance of all types. The ALP has not been an effective opposition and the NDP simply protests all ideas good or bad. The Wildrose Alliance has so much work yet to be completed to become a government in waiting, they have yet to be recognized. Progressiveness is linked to being socially liberal, but I believe in simply being socially responsible with little interference in Albertans lives. The more bills and laws that keep coming forward restrict our freedoms and add a huge amount of cost as well. Maybe with a progressive group working hard on the left/center and a party working on right centre we could force good government in the end, who knows.

What Reboot AB has done for me is confirm I am on the right path to bring about political change to our province. I will continue working with the Wildrose Alliance. We have all listened to the attacks from these same members that criticize the Wildrose for having no substance on their policy. We also know that the Wildrose Policies are set by it's members. The party in June of this year had 1200 active members which has swelled to 14,000. We have a leader that is a remarkable speaker and media savvy. We have the perfect set for bringing change into Alberta politics, and here is why I believe this:
  1. Since it is agreed our policy lacks substance and is set by it's members, by having a diverse group of members we will put forward common sense policy. We as a party can easily elaborate on the policies to include members of all political leanings much easier than trying to start up a party that concentrates only on a progressive view.
  2. We still have the opportunity to brand ourselves, before we are branded by everyone else as we roll out our policy platform.
  3. We are already an established political party recognized a a serious political threat, growing in strength by bringing in even more diverse membership base.
  4. A strong leader with a remarkable memory for policy and ability to speak without putting her feet in her mouth.

As I mentioned I think the Reboot movement is a great progressive movement, however in our province you will never form a government without being big tent. This is proven when we look at the history of politics in our province. The ALP and the NDP were never able to gain traction because of the choice to be left. The PC party remained because they were known to be fiscally conservative and socially progressive, unfortunately I don't see that they stand for either any longer, staying in power is the only goal.

My option for the Wildrose is simple and the party could use people from the progressive movement to help set up good policy. The same from all poltical stripes. There is a huge opportunity to brand this party as simply responsible both fiscally and socially. The membership in the party is still small enough to grow big tent and decide policy to include the majority of Albertans and not limit itself to conservative, progressive, liberal, etc... In the end I see the Wildrose party as being what was presented at reboot AB only on an all inclusive scale. The DJ Kelly post had a significant part in changing my thoughts, showing how common sense politics can be. Thanks to all involved at RebootAB as you have brought on a change in my way of thinking as well. I have spent far too long criticizing a party we all see the problems with. I will be blogging on the strengths of the Wildrose, discussing the policies and what can be bettered, bring them forward at the AGM, and work hard to bring in a variety of members to ensure the party indeed is "Big Tent" with a variety of ideas. I see this as the fastest and easiest way to bring change about. I don't think Alberta needs to re-boot, maybe simply an update. ;) Look forward to your comments Rebooters.

7 comments:

  1. Great post and I agree with you on nearly everything. I do wonder though if a big tent is supposed to include ALL viewpoints, if that means they are very offensive.

    I would probably give the WAP a chance if they publicly and in their policy, threw Bill 44 ideologies out the window.

    I have my thoughts posted here:

    http://bit.ly/6mbaff

    But great thoughts, and I am adding you to my progressives Google reader blog account, because you are one of the elightened ones :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Not everyone (or even nearly everyone) supported the idea of a new party emerging. There were quite a few of us in attendence who believe that the electoral system itself may need to be reformed. While I support the forward thinking and gumption of a new party (read translating ideas into action), time and time again, across the globe a "new" party promising change gets elected in the same manner as the last and realises that life is pretty okay as is and in power(end change here). I have serious reservations about supporting a new party or an old party so long as we continue with single member pluralities. I'd rather just have my vote count.

    -Shannon

    ReplyDelete
  3. I appreciate your wanting to be open, because closed minds see nothing. Perhaps the WRA has potential but I have very deep concerns about where the party is getting its financial support from and even more concerns about the refusal to state who those donors are. Maybe it is not required by LAW, but to hide behind the (paraphrased) statement that "some people don't want to be identified" even causes more concern as to what is being hidden. The distinct feel left behind is "if you are hiding this and not being forthcoming and honest then what else are you going to hide or are already hiding".

    People are tired of hearing promises by those running for election, only to have the majority of those promises broken. If you (aka person running and party leaders) can't be honest now, you offer no faith that you will be honest later.

    With all due respect :)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thx for this post AA. Your readers may want to visit www.rebootalberta.wordpress.com for a blog post my thoughts on the launch of Reboot Alberta this last weekend.

    The same old politics in the province are destroying our democracy and are no longer acceptable.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks for the comments so far. In order to make change in the Wildrose, instead of saying what they need to do first, put in the submission for policy review. Ten bucks for a membership to put all the policy submissions you can is cheap. (you do need five in agreement in your constituency)
    As far as the openess on the financial donations, you need to realize that there can be repercussions from the AB Govt. Dependant on where they come from personally and corporate, the GOA can negatively impact businesses and personal employment, so I understand where some are afraid of retribution. This being said I also understand the ability to buy favors. The best answer for this I am not sure, probably if you have fears don't donate and keep it open. This may be a good policy to set forward.
    This leader promised donors would not be disclosed, to break it now would be wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  6. AA.. pretty good post. But I don't really buy into the last point about concern for "retribution" by government.

    I've posted disagreement with the government myself, even as a member and a constituency executive member - and have never been met with any suggestion of being stifled or, worse, threatened.

    Plus.. the notion of government "negatively affecting business" is a scary premise. If someone is supporting the Wild Rose, but has an EXPECTATION of financial support coming back from government, apparently the PC Party at present, one might ask why they wouldn't assume a similar support from the WRA.

    I think it would be healthy for the WRA to break with "the same old" if that is truly their aim, and say, principal comes before money in THIS party. So - if you want to donate, you HAVE to be open to be disclosed. If not - keep your money in your own pocket.

    THAT would be refreshing.

    Personally, as a PC Member - my effort is to have my party do just that, and impliment strict donation limits.

    The addiction to donation money truly is the "crack" which is ruining the concept of "democracy".

    ReplyDelete
  7. Good post AA. I was at Reboot and the conversations were incredible. You would have fit right in with the level of thoughtful discussion (the ideas of Left/Right, conservative/liberal were irrelevant). I am leaning to the new social movement idea, maybe with a component of encouraging and supporting independent candidates who represent Reboot ideals in the context of their constituency (or vice versa - their constituency in the context of Reboot ideals).

    I went the new party route before with the Reform party that was going to change how politics was done and bring systemic change. That went terribly wrong. Good luck with your party building. The secrecy about the money donations should send some warning signals, but advice from this battle scarred veteran of betrayal is know who is in the backroom, what their agenda is, and watch them like a hawk.

    ReplyDelete